Lose Suh-weepstakes? Can't get the real McCoy? We can still name our Price!
What to do if Suh and McCoy aren't there after pick numbers 1 and 2 are gone? Draft a Safety and miss our chance at a defensive tackle? Maybe, but the Bucs arnt just after any ole D Tackle. We know what we need. And there is another option besides the two we have heard about lately.
UCLA's Brian Price.
Price is 300 Pounds and is fast, very fast, off the line. He reportedly excels at launching from the 3 technique and just gets better when the guys he faces get tougher.
Price has over 20 tackles for a loss including 8 in a three game span this past season, and more than 7 sacks on the year. The best part is he is doing it against double teams. His coach Frank Neuheisel and college scots think he is a sure first round pick, probably the third best Defensive Tackle in the draft behind Suh and McCoy.
He is a 300 Pounder with an exceptional first step, which is what's needed to be the next Warren Sapp, like Suh or McCoy. Or now Price.
2 recs |
82 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
I like everything
About this kid! He has a very high motor and has shown me more than the other two consistantly and I believe that his skill set and talent will transition better in the pros. A perfect fit for the Tampa 2 and the direction the Bucs seem to be heading in. This would not be a reach at 3.
by DaddyJax on Jan 15, 2010 6:56 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Very True
However, they could get him if they were able to move down in the draft all the while picking up some extra picks. I know a lot of people say that it’ s hard to move down in the draft, but if the Bucs ask for a little less than average compensation for the pick I am sure a bunch of teams would jump. Either way he could be a good fit. Now what about a pair of DE’s in the 2nd!!!
by ronnydobbs on Jan 15, 2010 7:38 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd love Price IF we can trade down
I’d take Berry over Price at the 3rd spot every day of the week. If we can get extra picks and move down for Price, then I’m all for it.
by aakks on Jan 15, 2010 8:10 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I like him
He does not come with all the hype.
by McBuc on Jan 15, 2010 8:14 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Who is the better student and has better character. I have no idea what any of these guys reputations are.
Having smart players on your team that have character counts for something. I know it seems like a strange thing to ask, but if it was between two very close picks, I may be inclined to go with the more intelligent, better person. It would be a bummer to have your #1 pick in jail in a year or two. BTW He looks awfully smart in those glasses. Ha Ha.
Gary Williams for President!
Put Rose in the Hall of Fame
by terp12 on Jan 15, 2010 9:28 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Price would be a good choice later in Round 1
If we miss out on the Suh / McCoy sweepstakes, trading down to get an additional pick and coming up with DT Price in the middle of Round 1 would be fine. Or ILB Rolando McClain. The S prospects of Berry, Thomas and Mays would also be fine.
by Cracker Ball on Jan 15, 2010 9:36 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
At this point
whoever we draft will be a good asset to our team. Of course, who is more effective is an entirely different question. I think we ought to stay where we are just to make sure we get either Suh, McCoy, OR Price. It’s good enough that we have two other picks from the top 55 prospects. I think we’re sitting pretty. It’s just a matter of sitting it out until April.
"What we do in life echoes in eternity..." - Maximus Decimus Meridius
by Buctooth on Jan 15, 2010 11:21 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Banned Phrases and Words
1) “you’re talking about a guy …” I don’t think I have to explain this one.
2) “swagger” This just needs to be expunged from the dictionary.
3) “The next Warren Sapp”
Look. The guy wasn’t just a good DT. He was a exceptional HOF 3-technique tackle. He’s an asshat to talk to, but was extraordinary. Which means you’re not going to find him every three years in the draft which is what every Kiper-esque column would have you believe.
How many Bruce Smiths have there been? How many Deacon Jones? C’mon.
We may well get someone awesome. Someday someone better than Sapp at what he did, but year-after-year I hear about this guy or that guy being the next Sapp and … well, you see how that works out.
Get a new angle for god’s sake.
by WordySanchez on Jan 15, 2010 11:41 AM EST reply actions 2 recs
Haha, thanks for this.
Its too easy to rehash all these cliches, why try to come up with something original?
by kurby on Jan 15, 2010 10:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
When I say " the next Warren Sapp" ,
Im coming from a BUCS perspective, not an NFL perspective. Im saying he is going to be the guy to replace Warren Sapp finally in the most important position on the Tampa Two defense. Warren Sapp was ours, he belonged to Tampa Bay, so as a Bucs Blogger, im calling him the next Warren Sapp because that is what I think he can be.
Now, I dont recall ever seeing your name on here, so thank you for making an appearance to criticize, without bringing anything new to the discussion at hand, other than said criticism, which I will ignore. I dont care what Mel Kiper is calling DTs, I will call Price, McCoy, or Suh the next Warren Sapp, because I feel they are, not because I cant think up a better adjective for them.
I done gone to skool like yoo tou werdy!
Tampa Bay Buccaneers fan since 1979
by Niko Houllis on Jan 16, 2010 6:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I dont have a problem with someone using a great NFL player as a comparison. Even if the player will never meet that potential it gives me a vivid picture of what type of prospect the Bucs could have. No body actually believes the prospect will be identical to that player, its just to give you an idea of the players style of play, or the compare the success that prospect is having at the college level.
Banned Phrases or words continued…
1) Telling someone how they should express their opinions.
2) Completley ignoring the OP to complain about your pet peeves.
"I will not amuse the tyrants or the susceptible."
by Hook85 on Jan 16, 2010 8:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Price option
My question is: Will price be there in the early second round? If we can’t get Suh or McCoy the best option is to go offensive. Dez Bryant has too much talent to pass up. I know that’s high but if we can’t trade down and take him you have to suck it up and pull the trigger. Then go defense from the 2nd round on out. I think he(Price) will be there in the second round.
by 1BucFan on Jan 15, 2010 12:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Are u saying
we take Dez Bryant with the number 3 pick over all?
by shadowchicken on Jan 15, 2010 7:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Dez Bryant
Remember the days when the Bucs would be destroying an offense until that one drive when the opposing offense figures where the soft spot is in the zone and they kick the winning field goal or score the winning touchdown in the NFC playoffs. Too many heartbreaking games. Time to have some exposiveness of our own…..Dez Bryant, then Trindon Holiday in the later rounds (6th or 7th) 4.27 or 4.28 40 time (sick) Now the bucs are a force to be reckoned with. The 2 2nd round picks thru the 5th or 6th picks could be dedicated to defense.Tyson Alualu, Lamarr Houston, Price to name a few. Time for the Bucs to be a true threat on offense. Caddy, Ward, Winslow, Freeman, Stroughter, Bryant, and Bryant. Who could cover all that? Playoffs in two years SB in three. Go Bucs!!!
by 1BucFan on Jan 15, 2010 11:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
but we had
caddy, ward, winslow, freeman, stroughter, and bryant this year and we only won 3 games, wouldnt it be easier to just pick up some dudes 4 our D??
by shadowchicken on Jan 16, 2010 8:01 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No way in heck we should take a WR with our #3 pick.
You realize the scenario you described above, where in some fantasy land the Bucs would lose on a late score? Well how about this year, losing because our defense couldnt stop anyone. Who care if we score 28 points a game if our defense cant stop anyone. Our offense, as is right now, is good enough to put 20ish points a game on the board. Our defense couldnt stop anyone this year.
Look at the Super Bowl teams and dominant teams the last few years, who has won it? Giants (defensive team, best DL that year), Steelers (defensive team, defensive POY), Bucs (best defense), Ravens (best defense), Colts (good offense, but their D was good that year), the Patriots (2 of the 3 years, their defense is what won games, not Brady).
Signature space available for rent - Got to pay the bills somehow
by Buc Wild on Jan 16, 2010 10:03 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No I dont remember any playoff games like your recalling.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers fan since 1979
by Niko Houllis on Jan 16, 2010 6:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Are you true fans or have you just gotten too old.
This is an offensive league. You don’t have Offense and your team more so your defense stays on the field and sonner or later gets torched and torched often. I for one am tired of watching the my Bucs get torched because the offense has one weapon after the run is stopped and he is double teamed. More so they blitz because we have no threats that can get open quick enough. Come On Man…you guys don’t recall all of those first round departures because the offense was transparent. It’s time opposing defenses shook when the bucs are on the schedule. Maybe we trade down but not to far to loose out on getting the kid. This is if Suh and McCoy are gone. If you are stuck at three you take the most explosive WR available (Dez Bryant). When another team picks him you guys will be wishing we had taken him, surely if we face him and he sheds Talib and Berry on a double move. Again Come On Man!!!!
by 1BucFan on Jan 17, 2010 11:38 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Shoot outs are nice but I prefer lobsided in our favor. The D is the biggest problem and it needs to be fixed badly.
Any offensive pick in the first round would be very, very, very disappointing.
I now completely understand the term "Gooberville"
by bucnut1 on Jan 17, 2010 9:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't care if he's a nice guy
I want someone who can blow up the middle on a weekly basis. I could care less if he wants to sign my hat.
by bobbyd4999 on Jan 15, 2010 12:06 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Bruins
I’m a UCLA alum and have been watching this guy his whole collegiate career. Hes great. When they took him out of the game we were always screwed because no one else played like him. He will be a solid NFL player on any team. He dominated the Temple Owls by himself, which he had done many times to other teams. He is going to be a good one for somebody!
by rx7ucla on Jan 15, 2010 12:26 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
My olf high school would dominate Temple.
I now completely understand the term "Gooberville"
by bucnut1 on Jan 15, 2010 12:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously you haven't seen Temple play. Obviously...
by rx7ucla on Jan 16, 2010 2:57 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And why would I care to?
I now completely understand the term "Gooberville"
by bucnut1 on Jan 16, 2010 12:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Is Frank Neuheisel Rick Neuheisel's dad? :D
I don’t know anything about this kid, I think I might have seen one UCLA game the entire year and that was against Tennessee, which was a dandy.
I have no doubt in my mind we have to fix the D-line, and if Suh and McCoy are gone. Then why not move down, get some extra picks and take this kid. But it would still be tough to pass on Berry, even if we did trade down to get him. We need help everywhere on D.
I now completely understand the term "Gooberville"
by bucnut1 on Jan 15, 2010 12:52 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Huge reach at 3
unless things change(workouts etc.). Still seems very unlikely to get into the top half of the 1st round. He would be very interesting in the 2nd round. I really don’t want berry at 3. I just think that is too high for a safety. He would have to be one of the best safeties in history to justify the pick. If McCoy and Suh are gone(doubt it) then I trade down, assuming a decent trade is out there. If we keep the 3rd, and the 2 DTs are gone, I would consider Haden or Okung. They play more critical position’s than safety.
"big-time players make big-time plays in big games."
by SoonerSlayer on Jan 15, 2010 1:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think the Bucs would have to take Okung
if they stay at three, they still have 2 more of the top 44 picks so they can go all defense in the 2nd round. That would really make the OL stellar and probably one of the best top to bottom especially if Sears gets back to playing like he did. When the Def reverted back to the Tampa2 things started to work. If they load up on D-Line in the 2nd round this could be one hell of a draft.
by ronnydobbs on Jan 15, 2010 5:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't need Okung, the line is fine, we need to resign some guys though.
I now completely understand the term "Gooberville"
by bucnut1 on Jan 15, 2010 5:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously?!
Our line is FINE. Our only problem was Zuttah was not experienced enough at guard. Well and everyone lost weight to move to a new system. AND that we used three different systems(Jeff,Gruden,Olsen). Alright that was more then one problem. But with Sears coming back hopefully, Zuttah gaining experience, Our offence will be under only Olsen’s system, and everyone gained weight, we have a monster O-line.
by Buc It on Jan 15, 2010 6:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, seriously
Your definition of fine is much different than mine. Overall the line is very overrated. As a unit they are average at best. Nothing more important for a young QB. Also you don’t draft for need at 3 or anywhere else. It’s all about value. The bucs suck. They need the best talent. I really don’t care what position they play. Teams that draft for need tend to poor at drafting. We need everything anyway so it works out.
"big-time players make big-time plays in big games."
by SoonerSlayer on Jan 15, 2010 7:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Uhh- tell me how
they be overrated, dawg?
Official head of the Eric Berry bandwagon.
Buc'em- Your source for everything buccaneer.
by Some other guy who does not care on Jan 15, 2010 7:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You don't draft for need
You draft for added value. If, hypothetically at #3 the best player in the draft was a QB, the Bucs never draft that QB because there would be very little added value: there already is a QB of the future. Similarly, drafting O-line that high makes no sense: a DT or even Berry will have a much bigger impact on performance than a better tackle will have, especially given that the O-line is young and improving.
by Sander on Jan 15, 2010 7:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see a need for an o-lineman.
I see the value of one of the best fits for our system im Berry. I see a guy that might be able to pass rush in McCoy. I don’t see a value of a O-lineman. Our line, as bad as you think it is, is not bad. It allowed minimal sacks and since Freeman can move very well, it is not a major need. If value is needed in a top three pick. We pick Suh, McCoy or Berry. Not Okung.
by Buc It on Jan 15, 2010 7:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I prefer to blame the coaching staff. :)
Lose weight, gain weight, predictable play calling, ONE formation in the playbook. See where I’m going with this?
I now completely understand the term "Gooberville"
by bucnut1 on Jan 15, 2010 9:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, the staff is at fault this year.
But next year, We will have gained the weight back and be under one system. The play calling is an unknown for this year but I’ll put money behind Olsen he gets it right.
by Buc It on Jan 15, 2010 9:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously I would rather trade down
However, while everyone here is saying the line is fine and HOPING Sears comes back and Zuttah gets more experience; no one has mentioned the stellar play of Trueblood. The most false starts of any lineman, taking stupid personal foul penalties that get him benched. Even before this year he hasn’t been that great of a RT. Okung or whoever the Bucs think would be the best OT of the draft would help out tremendously for years to come. That being said I think Berry would be a terrific fit in the backfield if the Tampa2 is still in place and I would be pleased if they drafted him.
by ronnydobbs on Jan 17, 2010 8:38 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You ever watch Trueblood play or you just can't past the occaisional penatly?
The penalties suck no doubt, but the guy is a very good and solid blocker. Should try watching him sometime.
I now completely understand the term "Gooberville"
by bucnut1 on Jan 17, 2010 11:27 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Really??
Is that why he gave up 8 sacks, 9 QB hits and 36 QB pressures this year and that the RBs could not get anything going to the right unless it was a catch out of the backfield?
Scroll all the way down to the bottom to find Trueblood’s name. Now maybe this has something to do with the scheme or coaching, but he was not very good or a solid blocker this year.
by ronnydobbs on Jan 17, 2010 5:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Scheme had everything to do with it. When the other team is constantly blitzing on his side and the coaching staff make no adjustments, is that Truebloods fault? I think not. Stats only tell part of the story. So yeah, Really.
I now completely understand the term "Gooberville"
by bucnut1 on Jan 17, 2010 9:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If Sears comes back and plays like he did in 2008
I think our line greatly improves. I am not interested in spending a #1 on OL. A #2 or later and you could probably talk me into it, but we can’t keep patching up areas we have already tried to fix unless we solve everything else. Our OL was not great by any means, but did we lose games becuase of them?
Signature space available for rent - Got to pay the bills somehow
by Buc Wild on Jan 16, 2010 10:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That's a big IF on Sears. I'm not gonna put all my eggs in his basket, he could flip out again.
I now completely understand the term "Gooberville"
by bucnut1 on Jan 16, 2010 12:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The reason why he was not there,
was not because he flipped out. He had a concussion and was unable to play. He had after effects of a concussion and couldn’t do anything for a while.
by Buc It on Jan 16, 2010 1:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Was more than just a concussion.
Sears has a neurological condition sustained from a concussion. Packing up going away and hiding from people is not a normal thing to do, even with a concussion. It was a bit more than that.
I now completely understand the term "Gooberville"
by bucnut1 on Jan 16, 2010 3:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He was with family,
Wouldn’t you want to be with them?
by Buc It on Jan 16, 2010 4:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather be with my team and get the best help I could get, not in a small town in AL.
Not like they can’t afford to live here and there. Either way, I’m very happy he’s making a recovery and planning on giving it a go, but he may not be the same player he was before.
I now completely understand the term "Gooberville"
by bucnut1 on Jan 16, 2010 6:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
flipping out WAS the after effects.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers fan since 1979
by Niko Houllis on Jan 16, 2010 6:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree, but my point stands.
Our OL was not great, but we didnt lose games because of them.
Signature space available for rent - Got to pay the bills somehow
by Buc Wild on Jan 17, 2010 9:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Price sounds good
but I would think trading down for additional picks and then selecting him would be best. There are two NFL teams which have two 1st round picks, maybe some trade down with them would work?? Then the bucs could persue another 1st round quality player. There is that chance that Price may fall to the 2nd round depending on the combine, but that may be a stretch. Also, there are a few later round (3-4) players that are touted with similar abilities just with less experience or something. Try looking at this link for the info: http://www.footballdraftanalysis.com/DT.html.
by Greghar on Jan 15, 2010 2:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Alright, Alright,
So we need a DT? We have a up-and-coming monster in Roy Miller. He plays Special Teams and he run fast then most guys. Think of that explosion and add another one. We need a guy who would get off the ball and break through the O-line. We also need that person to FILL SPACE. I havn’t looked up many DT’s in this draft but once the scouting combined is over and we get the numbers, I could see us picking the fastest, biggest, and/or stongest guy in the draft to hook up with Miller next year. Though I doubt it will be in the 1st Round, It would definently be in the second or even third. BTW, Miller is a 3rd.
by Buc It on Jan 15, 2010 3:07 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The classic Tampa 2 we used to run didn't really use any space-eaters
It was more about shooting gaps and getting pressure that way.
Taking Price at 3 is a waste of a great draft pick. I don’t know if there are any other good DTs in the draft we could take in the second round, but if there are I’d do that and pick up the extraordinary talent that is Berry and take a DT in the second round.
by Sander on Jan 15, 2010 5:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Take a look
at some of his highlights and other vids of him playing on youtube. Not os much of a space eater as he is a gap shooter and extremely fast off the snap. A true disrupter in the backfield
by DaddyJax on Jan 15, 2010 5:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I know our old T2 didn't use space eaters...
That’s why Bugger McFarland was not a strong pass rusher. But if we can get a guy that is 300-320, 6’-6’6", and can run a 4.8-5.0, we could pass rush and stop the run. That would be a dominate player in the T2(Reformed) with Morris or whoever he puts at D-Cordinator.
by Buc It on Jan 15, 2010 6:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not that good at D-line strategy
But I don’t think it works that way. The pressure is what made the T2 work, and if you take away that pressure you take away a lot of what makes it work.
What you’re talking about is a pretty big DT who is also excellent at rushing the passer
and stopping the run. Who are you thinking of that could do that, and does not get drafted in the first round?
by Sander on Jan 15, 2010 7:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Brian Price,
Arthur Jones, to a lesser extent Dan Williams, Lamarr Houston (underrated, I think), Greghar- put a nice link- below-read it.
Official head of the Eric Berry bandwagon.
Buc'em- Your source for everything buccaneer.
by Some other guy who does not care on Jan 15, 2010 7:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Think of it this way,
If we get a big fast dude that can be double teamed, our other DT and De’s will be 1on1 and can rush to the QB. Even with help from a TE, our LB’S will be able to get the running back. He doesn’t have to be a run stopper. Just be big enough to get double teamed and Pass Rush good.
by Buc It on Jan 15, 2010 9:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, corrected link for sscouting analysis
Put in the wrong lin for the scouting analysis. Try looking at their scouting reports: http://www.sidelinescouting.net/rankings/dt.shtml. It’s worth the reading.
by Greghar on Jan 15, 2010 3:20 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Here's a good Youtube video of this past season, good and bad stuff.
Seems to have very good timing on the snap and can penetrate the line, but also he gets pushed around and misses a lot of tackles. Not sure he’d be worth the #3 pick though, but like I said before, I don’t know too much about him.
I now completely understand the term "Gooberville"
by bucnut1 on Jan 15, 2010 6:21 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Urgh, link option stinks, here it is again.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irQMYESMEaY
I now completely understand the term "Gooberville"
by bucnut1 on Jan 15, 2010 6:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Guy's a beast if he becomes one on one.
Official head of the Eric Berry bandwagon.
Buc'em- Your source for everything buccaneer.
by Some other guy who does not care on Jan 16, 2010 11:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Also: The two cursed four letter network guys
Kiper and Mcshay like Mccoy and Berry (in respective order)
Official head of the Eric Berry bandwagon.
Buc'em- Your source for everything buccaneer.
by Some other guy who does not care on Jan 15, 2010 6:34 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
ESPN even has Berry listed as the #1 talent in the draft
Above Suh and McCoy. They think he’ll drop because safeties simply don’t get drafted #1.
by Sander on Jan 15, 2010 7:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If this kid
Is half of what you say he is, getting Berry and Price, i would be very very happy with our draft.
by shadowchicken on Jan 15, 2010 6:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
So you're joining the Eric Berry 'Wagon?
Official head of the Eric Berry bandwagon.
Buc'em- Your source for everything buccaneer.
by Some other guy who does not care on Jan 15, 2010 7:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Also
I can’t find a chest bump pic for my life:

Official head of the Eric Berry bandwagon.
Buc'em- Your source for everything buccaneer.
by Some other guy who does not care on Jan 15, 2010 8:42 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Morris to McCown "I don't care if you were the better QB, I'm trading your ass!!!" McCown replies "It's OK, you guys just gave me $2 million to sign the contract."
I now completely understand the term "Gooberville"
by bucnut1 on Jan 15, 2010 9:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If both Suh and McCoy are gone, trade down.
Berry is a great player and I was on his bandwagon for a while. But there are others available that Bucs can draft while picking up additional picks, i.e., Thomas later in the 1st or Chad Jones in the 2nd that are as talented. Scouting reports have Thomas listed as good as Berry with even better ball handling skills that could easily translate into a CB position.
I say trade down to get Price and pick up an additional pick or two. Doubt Price falls to the 2nd Round !!
IF Bucs are licky enough, (but unlikely) they may be able to trade with Seattle or the Niners for both their 1st Rounds, then draft for Price and Thomas. In FA, land Boldin – that way it won’t hurt by missing out on Dez Bryant and also grab a DT there.
Then in the 2nd Round, grab a DE and S (if unable with two 1st Round picks), OL, LB, CB, or another WR.
by Greghar on Jan 16, 2010 2:42 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Price Falls- Trust Me
I doubt he’s more talented than Suh, Mccoy, Cody, Odrick, Williams.
Official head of the Eric Berry bandwagon.
Buc'em- Your source for everything buccaneer.
by Some other guy who does not care on Jan 16, 2010 4:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe so ...
But Cody, Odrick and Williams don’t seem to be as good of a fit for the T2 – but could be wrong. If either Suh or McCoy are available at pick #3 or even a trade up, I would prefer them.
by Greghar on Jan 16, 2010 6:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Cody isn't- Odrick and Williams are.
Official head of the Eric Berry bandwagon.
Buc'em- Your source for everything buccaneer.
by Some other guy who does not care on Jan 16, 2010 7:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Boldin's not a FA
Official head of the Eric Berry bandwagon.
Buc'em- Your source for everything buccaneer.
by Some other guy who does not care on Jan 16, 2010 4:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thought he was???
He may be an RFA, but still there. But if not, maybe someone else.
by Greghar on Jan 16, 2010 6:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nope, he just wants out of AZ.
I now completely understand the term "Gooberville"
by bucnut1 on Jan 16, 2010 6:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nope, one year left on deal and he has no publicly said he wont request a trade
though Zona would be smart to move him now.
Signature space available for rent - Got to pay the bills somehow
by Buc Wild on Jan 17, 2010 9:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Trade Down To Get Price
I would realy like us to trade down. Our team needs to have draft picks lots of them. Trade down to get Price. A very good mid 1st RD pick. Get a 1st and pair it with a 2rd.We all know there are owners out there who would jump on a #3 pick, Not saying any names( Al Davis).That would give us,our 1st,3 second round picks and our 3rd.If you cant rebuild a team with that draft you dont belong in the NFL.
by gobuccs83 on Jan 17, 2010 6:30 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Trading down is a great idea for us...
… assuming that Suh and McCoy are both gone.
We can pick up another pick and still fill a need position from slot 10-12. Price may still be there, along with LB Rolando McClain, S Earl Thomas and S Mays a,d CB Joe Hayden. All would be upgrades for us. I just don’t want us to reach for somebody that would be there anyway.
by Cracker Ball on Jan 18, 2010 8:53 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I rather get price in the first round draft then berry cause with de’von hall our S who I watch him play in college is better then sabby, skill wise and with price on the team we should get more sacks and more QB hurry. And with price on the line it makes it better for our LB cause last year I seen our LB getting blocked by O-line and man I don’t no about u but when the O-line move the next level he’s doing his job..
IF U AIN'T A BUC GET THE BUC OUT OF HERE
by WE GOING TO THE SHIP on Jan 18, 2010 10:41 AM EST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.
On Facebook? Use Connect to join SB Nation. Share insights with fans and friends.- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by 


















