Opinions on QB Josh Johnson
Note: These opinions were copy and pasted from DRays Bay, without permission. Any edits were made solely for formating purposes, so there are some grammatical and spelling errors, as well as jokes in bad taste. My opinions stated in this roundtable are based upon 6 games I saw of Josh Johnson's senior season at San Diego.
PlayOnWords: Which of you tards wrote that JJ is a 3rd round talent?Suttree: THIS GUY.
PlayOnWords: That your legit opinion? Never saw him play in college; or, as FreeZo's commie brethren in Asiatown call it - university.Suttree: Actually, yeah. His tools are as good as anyone drafted in the first round, his only negatives are competition (which Joe Flacco/Tony Romo/Steve McNair and others have squashed as being a legitimate criticsm), an iffy deep ball (though excellent arm strength), and on the thin side (though plenty tall).
He could be a Randall Cunningham that doesn’t turn over the ball. No matter who you’re playing, you don’t throw 1 interception wihout some degree of intelligence, patience, and ability to read a defense.
Suttree: In all seriousness, I'll take Josh Johnson murdering II-A competition then Josh Freeman performing poorly against the Big 12. Especially when the only tool Freeman has on Johnson is size.
rglass44: He could be a Randall Cunningham So Steve Young?
Suttree: Honestly? There's a big disconnect between where he is and where Steve Young was with the Niners (obviously), but he's cut from the same mold.
rglass44: Cunningham without the TOs= Steve Young...
Suttree: Well, you say a guy's upside is Randall Cunningham and you're okay. You say a guy’s upside is Steve Young and people immediately laugh at you, but depending upon how his deep ball has developed, this could be the case.
rglass44: Well, you say a guy's upside is Randall Cunningham and you're okay. Especially if he’s black…Suttree: Beyond Steve Young, name me a list of quarterbacks known for their mobility and short to intermediate accuracy.
rglass: Rich GannonSandy Kazmir: Joe Montana
Ken Stabler
Rich GannonSuttree:Gannon and Montana were mobile, but not to the degree that Johnson is.
Sandy Kazmir: We've seen him execute one run, and he has said he would prefer to be a drop-back passer than running around like a fool.
Suttree: Oh, he is much more of a drop back passer. Actually, Gannon is probably the most apt comparison. Johnson plays a very simple game and it’s fantastic.
rglass44: Jeff Garcia PLEASE GOD NO
P Brady: Garcia throws INT. He’s basically Fran Tarkenton.
Suttree: Oh no, Johnson's much more patient in the pocket and has a better arm. Though, vintage Garcia was pretty badass.
Sandy Kazmir: I want to see more of it, sneak peek at my next article, if I'm still on board looks I did a data pull to look at all QB’s (on a single game basis) in their first season that had a completion % <= 40%,
QB rating <= 50.4, and at least 15 yards rushing. It’s a pretty sweet list with a quite a few good QB’s on itSuttree: His numbers are super deceptive. Yeah, he was facing soft coverage, but he had a third down pass dropped and a sure touchdown dropped. Those two drops completely skewered his numbers.
Sandy Kazmir: What about the drops that Leftwich had 3rd down drops are absolutely killer, we have now talked more actual football in this thread than Buc Em has all day
Suttree: I feel bad for Leftwich. He's a decent quarterback in a situation that was not good for him. The receivers let him down, the play calling has been unimaginative, his tight ends can’t block, and his offensive line is decent, at best. He’s made some bad decisions, but there have been a lot of plays left on the field thanks to his receiving core.
I’m excited for Johnson because he can bring some life to the offense that Leftwich can’t without better playcalling and design. He’ll take what the defense gives him, which will mean some success for us until teams start clamping down on the underneath routes and force him to prove he can lace a pass between a corner and a safety on the sideline fifteen yards downfield.
Suttree: corp, not core.
Top Gun Numba 1: lol, got that one wrong too. corpSBuc Wild: This is all the dialogue I was looking for over there. Acknowledgement that JJ has his upside but that this wasnt a Leftwich fail and he can succeed (and did) with the right scheme and help.
rglass44: Leftwich was better than Big ben in Pittsburg...
Suttree: Right. Although people say,“Leftwich has a big arm – let’s run a run heavy scheme!” that’s actually counter productive. His lack of mobility is a serious issue and by making him such an easy target (play the run on first down, understand you can blitz the offensive line because the tight ends are awful in pass protection), you expose him to getting hit on a regular basis and eventually making terrible decisions, which is exactly what happened.
Sandy Kazmir: So basically a faster Gradkowski As far as clamping down and forcing the deep ball. I think JJ has a much better arm, but he has to prove it. That deep throw down the sideline was on the money too bad no one can catch. With a top-5 pick next year I’m seriously debating whether we should just say screw the defense and get a great receiver. Our offense is a big-time playmaker away (assuming competent QB play) while our defense is an absolute mess and will not be solved by one draft.
Suttree: Better arm, less retarded than Gradkowski. Gradkowski also racked up his impressive completion percentage totals in an offense based on screen passes and wide receiver hitches. Johnson ran a pro-style West Coast offense where he was hitting slants and post patterns on a regular basis.
P Brady: I remember thinking his deep ball was a bit too floaty in college, actually. Officially now the head of the Lobstein bandwagon.
Suttree: Johnson has an issue with his deep ball, namely he doesn't consistently throw a rainbow. But, neither did Phillip Rivers. They both had a low release point, but I think Johnson can make the adjustments in his release so he can drop it over the shoulder without leaving it hanging. He’s got the arm strength for it.
rglass44: Rivers was also one of the ebst passers teh ACC has seen...
Suttree: Is dominating his competition as impressive as what Rivers did? Of course not, but it is impressive and frankly, better for his development than what Josh Freeman went through. You learn bad habits at the college level and they are tough to shake. I don’t think the speed of the game will catch up to Josh. The complexity of blitz packages and coverages? Possibly, but he’s had a whole year of breaking down tape and practicing against an NFL defense. If Joe Flacco, who looked retarded any time a team through a zone blitz at him in college, can succeed in the NFL, I think Josh Johnson has a shot.
rglass44: I still can't get over the fact that TYLER PALKO was the cause for Flacco transferring.
Suttree: It's outrageous, but Dave Wannstedt isn't the best evaluator of quarterback talent. Also, it takes certain situations to bring out the best in a player. Tom Brady was a huge underachiever in college, consistently beaten out by Brian Griese, but the skills we see at the NFL level were there at the college level. He just needed the right environment to bring out the best in him. Maybe it was the same for Flacco.rglass44: I almost touched on that as well. He’s such an idiot.
Content provided by a member of Buc 'Em and does not necessarily reflect the view or opinions of Buc 'Em.
0 recs |
10 comments
Comments
This is what made the drafting of Freeman so peculiar
I have no issue with drafting a QB for the future if you feel that there isnt’ a guy on the team who can fill that role. I thought we had that guy (JJ). We’re about to find out. The optimist in me says we could see a Brees/Rivers situation, but I don’t think thats happening. If JJ performs well, it’s just going to lead to controversy.
I like what I’ve seen from him thus far, and wish we cuold have seen him in against a real defense at some point other than Week 4 2009 as a starter.
www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer
by Buc Wild on Sep 30, 2009 2:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The trick with quarterbacks is that there is almost always a disconnect between the front office, the head coach, and the offensive staff (qb coach/oc).
Doug Williams and Jon Gruden may have loved Josh Johnson and his possiblities, but Raheem Morris may not have. It’s not surprising to see them go in the direction of drafting a quarterback, even as one with as many holes as Josh Freeman. Developing a quarterback takes a lot of effort and committment, and even if they weren’t making the best selection, atleast the front office and coaching staff are on the same page about Freeman.
It might prove to be a foolish selection, but you never know how Josh Johnson performed in practices last year. Obviously, he still has a lot to prove on the field, so this all may be jumping the gun a bit, but frankly, I’m very excited about his potential.
by Suttree on Sep 30, 2009 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
wow JJ bandwagon ABOOOOARRDDD!
LOL, If we all jump on now, it will look as if we were JJ fans all along…
by Hook85 on Sep 30, 2009 11:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm Pro-JJ but mostly because I wanted to see him against first string talent since last year
I mean, here we have a young guy on the bench that had some impressive looking stats (against lower level competition) and that actually had the veteran loving Gruden was actually excited about (along with several members in his front office). Not to mention this guy rose in the draft right behind Flacco (was said to need a least a year on the bench). Of the few passes he has thrown in both preseasons, some of them seem to flash excellence. So, I naturally wanted to see what this guy can really do, but of course, Freeman arrived and that kind of ruin that up until now. So, finally we’ll all get to see what he can do. Hopefully, he doesn’t have it in his mind that he has to beat out Freeman just yet.
by NewLogic on Oct 1, 2009 2:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I kept saying in the preseason that JJ needed to be the started
not Lefty or Freeman. He’s got the tools and he can improvise with his feet. I believe he can by time by being able to move around the pocket and if the receivers can’t get open, take off downfield. That’s something Lefty couldn’t do and while Freeman is a mobile, I don’t he’s as fast as JJ. I think JJ comes in and plays with a chip on his shoulder and takes control of the offense. Hopefully the line gives him time though and they can get the runnning game going.
by gonolesrolltide on Oct 1, 2009 2:33 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Look at all the Pros...
Quick release
Speed
Mobility (not just the speed, but the ability to actually move around with that speed)
Accuracy
The man threw something like 45 to 1 TD to INT in college. I realize he didnt play for a top notch program, and against lesser competition, but he also had the same level supporting cast.
I wouldn’t be surprised if once Faine is back he excels with us. Im just not expecting it this week, although hoping he does.
by Niko Houllis on Oct 1, 2009 7:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
According to several Bucs teammates
He’s supposed to be pretty smart and dedicated as well. In one of the latest articles, it says he showed 6 am every morning all last year to go over game film even though he was gonna be inactive.
by NewLogic on Oct 1, 2009 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope he is
as good as advertised. I would love to have that old feeling of optimism back
by LeeCaz on Oct 1, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thats super impressive considering..
what Hovan said about Bucs players sunday… “We need more players that can play, and less that can play” , last play indicating playing Madden 10, which a lot of players play too much instead of look at film (insinuates Hovan). Heard this on 620 Interview on Sunday.
by Niko Houllis on Oct 1, 2009 8:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















