Buc 'Em: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

The most popular guy in town.

He is...........the most unpopular man in town.

More photos » by Reinhold Matay - AP

He is...........the most unpopular man in town.

There's an old football saying that's been around for a few years.  "The backup quarterback is the most popular guy in town."  It's never specific to any one player but instead points to the psyche of the modern day average football fan.  The perception of the unknown.  It's easy as a fan to always want the back up, he surely can't be worse than the guy who's in there right now, right? 

Star-divide

This is a fundamental flaw in how we look at our teams.  We've gotten to the point as fans where one ill-advised pass, one errant throw has the boo birds out in force.  This isn't an issue just with the Bucs, but with just about every pro team in every sport.  We all try to armchair quarterback our way through this.  The starter throws a 5 yard pass on 3rd and 8?  Pull him, he sucks, the backup could do better.  He throws an incomplete pass on 2nd and goal?  Worst quarterback I've ever seen, get him out of there. 

And when we bring the back up in, and he performs nicely for a few plays, we feel like we should be on the coaching staff.  After all, it was our idea in the first place.  But 9 times out of 10 something happens; the back up starts to regress and starts to make mistakes.  At first we turn a blind eye, "He just needs to get into a rhythm" or "He's been on the bench for a few weeks, give him time."  It won't be long until the proverbial honeymoon period is over and we start clamoring for the starter, who coincidentally has become the back up, thus making him the most popular guy in town and completing this bastardized circle of life.

I always look at it like a 6th man in basketball.  The back up QB is the guy coming off the bench, much like the 6th man, who brings some new energy to the game.  He brings a different look, a different skill set, which throws off the defense.  He (they) get the team running around, performing well, closing the gap.  But then a funny thing happens.  There's a wall there for him to hit.  He (they) can't keep it up forever.  Inevitably, the starter finds their way back into the game and life goes on.   The backup QB, the 6th man are just a "spark" off the bench.  After all, there's generally a reason why they are the backup in the first place.

There are plenty of examples of this in the NFL.  We've seen backups come in for a few plays or few games and keep things moving in the right direction.  Jeff Garcia, Byron Leftwich, Charlie Batch, Kerry Collins, etc.  Garcia with the Eagles would come in and start moving the ball with his dink and dunk passing game and his erratic scrambling.  Philly fans loved it.  He moved the chains, he was exciting, he was the most popular guy in town.  The magic will wear off at some point andyou're usually left with a player with a sub-par skill set as compared to the starter.  One bad play turns into ten and pretty soon, the starter is back out there.

Which brings me to the Bucs.  Every year, with every quarterback, there are boos heard.  We wanted Brad Johnsonout, he couldn't go deep and couldn't run.  We wanted Shaun King out, too inexperienced.  We wanted Griese out, we wanted Griese in.  We wanted Chris Simmsto play, we wanted him out of town.  We loved Garcia, then we wanted someone else to go downfield.  Now here we are with Leftwich.  Game 1, we were all pretty dang pleased with how he did.  Game 2, not as good, but 3 TD's, 2 INT's and a boatload of yards.  Please sir, I'd like some more.

Then came game 3.  I'm not making any excuses for Leftwich, he was awful.  But here's a newsflash, so was the rest of the team.  The plays that I saw where he dumped it off, no one was open.  I can't confirm that on all plays, but on the majority, he made the right read.  The interception he threw?  That was a terrible decision, no bones about it.  The short of it is this, Leftwich struggles.  We've said all along, if the OL gives him time, he will be good.  If they collapse, he is toast.  Well guess what, the line collapsed, he was toast.  This isn't a surprise.  This was a fail from top to bottom.

Then Josh Johnsoncame in and he started moving the chains.  Everyone wants to talk about how good he looked and he's much better for our team.  No doubt the kid is talented, but before we start patting ourselves on the back, where's the outrage?  After all, we've lambasted Leftwich for throwing only rockets, and JJ did the same thing in the red zone.  What about escaping the pocket?  We used to hang our heads when Garcia did that?  It's the honeymoon phase.  The backup QB can do no wrong.

Now before you jump all over me and say I'm biased against Josh Johnson, I'm not.  I thought the guy deserved a chance in pre-season.  If he's the guy, I'll gladly back him and root for him.  But we have to see him for what he is.  He played a pretty mediocre drive towards the endof a blowout with some backups in the game.  He did move the ball, but it was limited success in a short sample.  Hardly anything we can derive conclusions from.  The grass is always greener, am I right?

So the Buc stand here witha  problem.  We have a starting quarterback who has a certain skill set.  The playbook supposedly falls in line with those skills.  When our line blocks, this quarterback can deliver the ball andmake plays.  When that doesn't happen, it's a bloodbath.  We have a backup who has a different skill set.  He may or may not be well suited for this offense andthis team.  When he comes in, we wildly cheer his success.  Any mistakes he makes are met with averted eyes.  But if we're gonna call out Leftwich, Garcia, Simms, Griese, Brad Johnson, then why don't we do the same to the back up?

And thus we see the true problem.  As fans we are only able to see a limited piece of the puzzle.  We see the hear and now andonly the last play.  A true "What have you done for me lately"  We've seen in every sport fans play coach with their perfect 20/20 vision in hindsight.  Should've run instead of passed, should've bunted instead of swinging away, should've shot the three, not driven to the hoop.  We boo the first signs of mistakes and don't let up.  The calls for the backup commence and when he's brought in, life is good.  But when he makes a mistake, we don't boo him.  We give him the long leash that we denied the starter, but why?

Oh yea, he's the most popular guy in town, and we're just hoping he'll remember that it was us who wanted him to play.

0 recs  |  Comment 42 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

get over your love for leftwich !!

he has never succeeded anywhere an thats why we want a new QB, cause obviously hes not gonna succeed here either ! three interception and three touchdowns ? why wouldn’t you want someone else who we have never seen to get a shot ? tom Brady is the best example so get over the dumb statue who cant move in the pocket he sucks !!

by the420bucsfan on Sep 28, 2009 10:07 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

One, it's 4 TD's and 3 INT's

Two, this just looks at backups vs starters in the fans eyes. I’m no Leftwich fan. He’s our starting quarterback. Ive called him out on every mistake he’s made.

www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer

by Buc Wild on Sep 28, 2009 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We don't have a starter right now

You said it yourself, leftwhich is a backup. This team is going nowhere with him behind center so why not see what we got? Whether it’s Freeman or Johnson we need to play for the future. Maybe it will bring a little excitement to a team that has none at all.

by kurby on Sep 28, 2009 10:37 AM EDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

I'm completely against Freeman coming in right now

www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer

by Buc Wild on Sep 28, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree with sitting Freeman

Look at the experience his peers are getting. Mark Sanchez is leading the Jets at an unprobable 3-0. Matthew Stafford FINALLY got the Lions a win. More than I can say what Tampa is doing with Free. As good as Josh Johnson looked yesterday, Morris said it himself projecting Johnson as Free’s “career backup”. What’s the point in startin JJ? NOW is the time to announce that Josh Freeman will be our starter indefintely.

All we have to look forward to right now are blackouts and who were gonna pick in the top overall pick next year, so management may as well give us something to cheer about. And it starts with starting Free

by TheUltimateBucFan on Sep 28, 2009 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Look at the article I wrote a few days ago.

There isn’t a huge argument for starting right away. You are also assumin that Stafford and Sanchez are identical to Freeman. What was said about the three. Staffrd/Sanchez were seen as NFL ready, Freeman was not. Morris has said, Freeman isnt ready. So why throw him out there?

Throwing a QB on an awful team who isn’t ready is just asking to get him killed.

www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer

by Buc Wild on Sep 28, 2009 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sanchez and Stafford

are WAY better than Freeman right now. I’m to the point where I don’t care anymore though. Go ahead and put in Freeman. I’ll be the one sitting here laughing and saying I told ya so.

by LeeCaz on Sep 28, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ofcourse they are better

Freeman was coddled, sheltered and left attached to Morris’ teet.

by buccanator on Sep 28, 2009 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

why would you say something like that to me?

When have I ever judged the players after one game? I judged Raheem Morris after one preseason. That’s a bit different though. I could say people like you have blind faith and fail to hold the front office accountable for their mistakes, but I don’t, because I appreciate your optimism, no matter how misguided I believe it is.

Don’t get mad at me for telling it like it is.

by LeeCaz on Sep 29, 2009 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If we screw up Johnson

we don’t lose much of an investment. If we screw up Freeman it will be tough to recover from.

"I have come that you may have life, and life to the max"

by UNFNOLE on Sep 28, 2009 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

NO LOVE FOR LEFTWICH HERE...

…but this post is right on. THE TEAM IS A MESS. Leftwich isn’t the reason were 0 and 3. The D needs to gel. Once we get some decent play from them, you’ll see some more poise from the QB position. Its hard to establish a running game when your playing from behind. Tom Brady came in on a team with an amazing D. He didn’t have to push anything because he knew the D would get him the ball back. Not to imply Leftwich is Tom Brady, but you put Brady with the Lions ten years ago instead of New England and we wouldn’t be having this conversation.

by louieyak on Sep 28, 2009 10:44 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

We need a change

I supported Luke Mccown in the preseason because he simply did better than lefty. Im not going to lie, leftwitch did great the first two games but when we stray so much from the running game by being down by 2 or three touchdowns in the first half i dont want the game to be in the hands of a statue with a long wind up. Josh Johnson looked really good against one of the top defenses in the league and almost doubled our entire offensive production on 1 drive( we had 35 yards before johnson’s drive). I think johnson showed he is the right guy 4 now.

by Buccaneers11 on Sep 28, 2009 12:46 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Leftwich is a known commodity.

He’s displayed his mediocrity openly for many years. He’s not a starting caliber QB. He had his shot, we lost 3 games pretty badly. As long as were losing, let’s get someone else out there. Who knows, Johnson could be the next big thing. Or, he could be even worse than Leftwich. If he loses the next few, I’d say around week 7 or 8 is the time to start Freeman.

by Albertrayon on Sep 28, 2009 12:56 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The main problem with yesterday's game was

Was that both of our lines were being dominated, which hurt Leftwich on the offensive side. JJ looked better simply because he can do everything quicker, from dropping back to how he releases. Now I’m pro-JJ, but that doesn’t necessarily make him better, it just means he was quicker and was able to make plays behind a struggling Mahan line. JJ is still obviously inexperienced and that showed up in the red zone, which is supposed to be the hardest area for young quarterbacks.

Now with that out of the way, I’d like say that you shouldn’t compare any other city to Philly in this regards. Sure McNabb does some stupid things from time to time, but the fact is the guy has had the Eagles competitive each year in a pass happy system, all while being in a tough division. Yet, every time the slightest thing occurs, they scream for him to be replaced.

by NewLogic on Sep 28, 2009 1:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think Leftwich

deserves another week. He did have a pretty spectacular first two games. Going into week 3 he had one interception in 91 pass attempts. He isn’t turning the ball over frequently.

The problem is the offensive line (which is supposed to be a strength for us). Injuries have plagued this unit, but injuries plague every offensive line, every season. It is an injury prone position. The lack of depth is on the coaching staff and front office.

We only ran the ball ten times!!! How can you expect any QB to be successful when you have 28 rushing yards in a game?

by LeeCaz on Sep 28, 2009 1:32 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This

he was done no favors by any of the players, and now the coaching staff has given up on him. Blame him for the bad decision making, but I hear almost NO ONE talking about how pitiful our line and receivers are. Its embarrassing.

www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer

by Buc Wild on Sep 28, 2009 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Funny enough

even though our oline was terrible, Leftwich didn’t let them get a sack

by NewLogic on Sep 28, 2009 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You hit the problem right on the head

The offensive line is not performing. The reason that the line is not performing is because Mahan is getting out matched and just destroyed. If the center is week, the line is weak. The part of being a coach is being able to make adjustments. This is what seperates good coaches from bad ones. Let me state this , I am not making any assessment on Morris, 3 games just isn’t enough. What I am saying is that he is atleast showing that he is willing to make adjustments. The line sucks right now any the only way to adjust is to put a mobile QB back there. This is why the change was made, not because of the win/loss record or the TD/INT. It is simply the fact that the line can not provide leftwich with the time to be successful.

The redskins and eagles are known for their defense and the road all season is not going to get any easier. The bucs just can’t protect Leftwich and this is why JJ is given the opportunity. JJ Has a quick release and he is mobile. Some may say that JJ messed up on the goal line but the coaching staff is looking at it like this, if the game is within reach, they are going to run the ball on the goal line.

A run is a run whether it is from the rb’s or the QB , it all counts as rushing yards. JJ can add to the rushing total, which keeps the bucs on their game plan of running the ball. In the NFL, The statue QB was a thing of the 90’s and early 2000’s. The only immobile QB i can think of in the NFL right now is KERRY COLLINS and the titans are 0 and 3 . You need a qb who can scramble, he doesn’t haveto scramble to run but you need a qb that can avoid the rush and buy time to complete a pass.

by tbbuc4 on Sep 28, 2009 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Manning and Brady know how to move around the pocket

They know how to buy time. Leftwich doesn’t know how to buy time. He gets cremed on every pass. Manning and brady finish the games with clean jerseys, Leftwich on the other hand is not mobile and has a slow release. You can’t have both. If you are going to be slow, you must have a quick release.

by tbbuc4 on Sep 28, 2009 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He is just as bad as the OL

Receivers…etc…etc…yatta yatta. No matter what team Leftwich would be on he would still play the same. Slow, Dumpy quarback play.

by buccanator on Sep 28, 2009 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So he lost game 1 and 2 for us?

This team is playing bad. He played particularly bad Week 3. But if you think JJ or Freeman would have won games 1,2 or 3, you’re sadly mistaken

www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer

by Buc Wild on Sep 28, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No ofcourse we wouldn't have

we are a terrible team. Just don’t be an apologist for Leftwich. He is and always will be a sorry excuse for a Professional Football Player. He is a great team leader though, lmao.

by buccanator on Sep 28, 2009 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Disagree with you, Buc Wild

I was adamantly against Byron Leftwich being named the starter from Day 1. I thought that the “QB competition” was a joke from the get-go. First off, Raheem stated that Leftwich “won” the job with his play in camp and strong leadership. How can a quarterback truly be judged without a rush? At any rate, I’m a fan and a paying customer, and I just plain don’t want to support another retread quarterback.

Mostly, I hate wasted games and times. I failed to see the benefit of playing Leftwich for his “experience” and “leadership” when his experience and leadership had never produced a playoff win. Yes, the players around him are not great, but in reality, a great quarterback can make those around him better. We should have used this entire season developing either Luke McCown or Josh Johnson rather than retreading Leftwich. I think most Buccaneers fans hated this move right from the start-so any backup QB would be good. Would we have won with McCown or Johnson, I don’t know, but I’d like to think we’d be getting them valuable experience and devloping valuable assets.

by bucsfandave on Sep 28, 2009 2:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

but in the mean time

you are paying guys like Antonio Bryant 9.8 million. Winslow and Clayton got huge contracts. They went into the season trying to actually win and it was the right move. QB’s are supposed to develop in college. They are supposed to win in the NFL.

by LeeCaz on Sep 28, 2009 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that would should be spending the season developing JJ

but McCown seemed to be going nowhere except the same place his brother ended up. He had his flashes when we started him, but after that he would make costly mistakes. It just seem he had some error in his decision making from time to time. Even if Gruden wasn’t fired, it would of most likely either been Garcia and JJ battling as the starter. Trading him was the best thing for him, because simply, the old regime had no faith in him and the new regime had no faith in him.

I think for the most part, Leftwich was brought in for the young guys to learn leadership from as in how to manage the team and how to handle various situations. That and to take a beating while they get things worked out, as cruel as that may be.

by NewLogic on Sep 28, 2009 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Leadership

I don’t understand why people always talk about so and so retread’s leadership. You can not lead if you are not good. It is that simple. Does Josh Freeman look at Byron Leftwich and his windup and say, “what a leader, I need to follow him”? Do other teammates see all of his overthrows and say, “I’ll follow him anywhere”? How is he “mentoring” younger quarterbacks? Does he tell them, “Hey, you have an unconventional throwing motion that coaches and critics routinely despise, but don’t work on it, just cash your checks and someone else will give you a shot.”?

I’m so tired of this falsehood about experienced quarterbacks mentoring young up and comers. Tom Brady, Ben Rothlisberger, Peyton Manning, and Drew Brees are all examples of guys that knew they had to work hard, led from the beginning, and improved without a “mentor”. As a QB, you have it or you don’t. You can improve your skills and get better through hard work and practice, but no one worth their salt was “mentored” into being a better QB. I don’t buy that.

As for paying Winslow and AB, that’s an excuse. You should always be building to be a great team. And no great team starts Leftwich.

by bucsfandave on Sep 28, 2009 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let me preface this by saying this is tongue in cheek
You can not lead if you are not good

Than why do people want to bring back Brooks?

www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer

by Buc Wild on Sep 28, 2009 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Are you serious?

your actually saying that Brooks playing wouldn’t improve the worthless piece of shit excuse of a team we have. You are completely out of your mind. The lack of respect to the greatest Buccaneer is absolutely unbelievable. So dissapointed in you.

by buccanator on Sep 28, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Calm down Sparky

what does the title of my post say? Check
Where did Brooks go to college? Check
What college team do I root for? Check
What pro team do I root for? Check
How many Brooks autographs on jerseys, helmets and pictures do I have? 5. Check

You’re point that you can’t lead if you aren’t good is a stupid statement. There are plenty of players, ex players and guys kept around a team to lead, and it’s not because they are good or were good, it’s their insight into the game, the ability to teach.

www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer

by Buc Wild on Sep 28, 2009 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And if you don't know what tongue in cheek is

maybe you can find what sarcasm means.

www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer

by Buc Wild on Sep 28, 2009 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We need a change

there is no leadership across the board. My point even if he wasn’t as good as he use to be, the leadership alone could elevate the team better than what it is now.

by buccanator on Sep 28, 2009 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But you just said you can't lead if you aren't good.

Maybe what you should have saidYou can’t measure leadership, but you cant say Leftwich cant lead becuase he isnt good and then say other players who arent (currently) good can lead. Youre backtracking and contradicting yourself.

www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer

by Buc Wild on Sep 28, 2009 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Leadership

I was the one who said you can’t lead if you aren’t good. I don’t think you can be an effective leader. Remember last year when this team needed one win in their last four to clinch a playoff spot? As I recall, Brooks, my all-time favorite Buc, was on this team and his “leadership” consisted of chasing Michael Bush. Yes, a player can provide help in preparation, but Brooks is an all-time great. Leftwich can not be a leader if no one on this team has ever seen him lead a team to victories.

by bucsfandave on Sep 28, 2009 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

False.

Im pretty sure everyone here is saying we should start Freeman because Sanchez is leading teams to victory. No one saw him lead teams to victories, hes a rookie. Its just one blind statement after another.

You can be an effective leader if you aren’t good. Tomlin is a great leader, he’s not a very good football player last I checked. Leadership is not correlated to aptitude in playing the game.

www.bucem.com - SBNation's source for all things Buccaneer

by Buc Wild on Sep 28, 2009 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Different players develop in different ways

Manning took the helm from day one and developed that one.
Brees was up and down winning then losing his job to Flutie before he suddenly broke out when Rivers was to take over.
Brady sat a year under Bledsoe and took over when he went down.

Now Manning has a former NFL quarterback as a father, so that might of helped him in starting from Day 1. But both Brees and Brady were on the team with notable veterans of varying caliber. They didn’t necessarily have to learn their whole game from said veterans, but just pick up tips along the way to help them develop.

Now Kurt Warner, on the other hand, you can argue that he made his way to where he is.

by NewLogic on Sep 28, 2009 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like the move for JJ as starter

that is the kind of move to stir things up. They need to keep going, there is alot more that needs to be done.

by buccanator on Sep 28, 2009 2:57 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Five words.....

Finally, Morris does something right!!!

by allen m on Sep 28, 2009 6:51 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Before we saw him play, what Buc fan was truly excited at seeing Lefty hired?

Seeing as how he had no guarantee, they should have ditched Leftwich at the start. Trading McCown was good for everyone. As average as he was, Garcia was still an asset. Should have brought him back when Gruden got fired. ( He’s available again…) Unlike Lefty, Garcia has actually been GOOD in the past. He might be able to mentor these young guys. That’s theory though. Looking at the facts, starting Johnson is the best option we have right now. Freeman is NOT as good as Sanchez and Stafford, who will likely show their own weaknesses before long. Freeman also has quite a bit of an ego, and from what I saw in the preseason, it is from immaturity rather than skill. Give him time, his best chance at success is next year, and maybe using him sparsely in the end of this year, if Johnson starts stinking it up. I don’t think Johnson is the next big deal, but I think he is the balance between inexperience (Freeman) and lack of skill and common sense (Leftwich).

by NYBucFan on Oct 6, 2009 10:22 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

Welcome to Buc 'Em, SBNation's home of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Your one stop for Buccaneers info, videos, opinions and more.
Start posting about the Buccaneers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Percy-harvin-p1_small
Does Josh Freeman have poise?
Wood-83_small
Time For A What If? Moment
Ou_logo_youtube_blue_55_55_small
THATS A WIN VS THE FINS...CUZ WE HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE!
Tampa_bay_buccaneers_primary_logo_small
Official discussion board for Week 10 officiating
Stairs_small
Quarterback Cliche's I Hate
Nfl_tampa_bay_buccaneers_1_small
Several Bucs listed on early injury report for Week 10
Percy-harvin-p1_small
Bucs vs Dolphins (Florida bragging rights)
Tampa_bay_buccaneers_primary_logo_small
Josh Bidwell, a police officer, four Washington Apples and Doug Williams
Small
DO YOU BELIEVE IN MAGIC? THE BUCS JUST MIGHT!
Small
Congratulations!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Acme Packing Company
Friday Injury Report: 49ers at Packers
Acme Packing Company
Matthews: NFL Rookie of the Week
Gang Green Nation
Another Patriot Running his Mouth (surprise)-- Moss on Revis

Twitter Feed


Editor & Lead Writers

1001_large_small Niko Houllis

Nfl_tampa_bay_buccaneers_1_small Buc Wild

Tampa_bay_buccaneers_primary_logo_small Paul Mueller

Assistant Writers

Bucco_bruce_small Craig T

Stairs_small UNFNOLE

Buclogo_small LeeCaz

218px-tampa_bay_buccaneers_logo bucsfandave